| Title |
Consensus statement for stability assessment and reporting for perovskite photovoltaics based on ISOS procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Energy, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41560-019-0529-5 |
| Authors |
Mark V. Khenkin, Eugene A. Katz, Antonio Abate, Giorgio Bardizza, Joseph J. Berry, Christoph Brabec, Francesca Brunetti, Vladimir Bulović, Quinn Burlingame, Aldo Di Carlo, Rongrong Cheacharoen, Yi-Bing Cheng, Alexander Colsmann, Stephane Cros, Konrad Domanski, Michał Dusza, Christopher J. Fell, Stephen R. Forrest, Yulia Galagan, Diego Di Girolamo, Michael Grätzel, Anders Hagfeldt, Elizabeth von Hauff, Harald Hoppe, Jeff Kettle, Hans Köbler, Marina S. Leite, Shengzhong (Frank) Liu, Yueh-Lin Loo, Joseph M. Luther, Chang-Qi Ma, Morten Madsen, Matthieu Manceau, Muriel Matheron, Michael McGehee, Rico Meitzner, Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin, Ana Flavia Nogueira, Çağla Odabaşı, Anna Osherov, Nam-Gyu Park, Matthew O. Reese, Francesca De Rossi, Michael Saliba, Ulrich S. Schubert, Henry J. Snaith, Samuel D. Stranks, Wolfgang Tress, Pavel A. Troshin, Vida Turkovic, Sjoerd Veenstra, Iris Visoly-Fisher, Aron Walsh, Trystan Watson, Haibing Xie, Ramazan Yıldırım, Shaik Mohammed Zakeeruddin, Kai Zhu, Monica Lira-Cantu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 13% |
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8% |
| Germany | 8 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 51% |
| Scientists | 45 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 986 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 986 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 215 | 22% |
| Researcher | 160 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 115 | 12% |
| Unknown | 312 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 175 | 18% |
| Engineering | 108 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 108 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 79 | 8% |
| Energy | 63 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 7% |
| Unknown | 380 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#204,304
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Nature Energy
#123
of 1,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,999
of 466,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Energy
#4
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.