| Title |
Patient Assisted Intervention for Neuropathy: Comparison of Treatment in Real Life Situations (PAIN-CONTRoLS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Neurology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2590 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard J. Barohn, Byron Gajewski, Mamatha Pasnoor, Alexandra Brown, Laura L. Herbelin, Kim S. Kimminau, Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam, Omar Jawdat, Mazen M. Dimachkie, Stanley Iyadurai, Amro Stino, John Kissel, Robert Pascuzzi, Thomas Brannagan, Matthew Wicklund, Aiesha Ahmed, David Walk, Gordon Smith, Dianna Quan, Darryl Heitzman, Alejandro Tobon, Shafeeq Ladha, Gil Wolfe, Michael Pulley, Ghazala Hayat, Yuebing Li, Pariwat Thaisetthawatkul, Richard Lewis, Suur Biliciler, Khema Sharma, Kian Salajegheh, Jaya Trivedi, William Mallonee, Ted Burns, Mark Jacoby, Vera Bril, Tuan Vu, Sindhu Ramchandren, Mark Bazant, Sara Austin, Chafic Karam, Yessar Hussain, Christen Kutz, Paul Twydell, Stephen Scelsa, Hani Kushlaf, James Wymer, Michael Hehir, Noah Kolb, Jeffrey Ralph, Alexandru Barboi, Navin Verma, Moiz Ahmed, Anza Memon, David Saperstein, Jau-Shin Lou, Andrea Swenson, Tiyonnoh Cash |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 30% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 187. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#217,768
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#293
of 5,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,424
of 534,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#7
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.