| Title |
A Quantitative Proteome Map of the Human Body
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lihua Jiang, Meng Wang, Shin Lin, Ruiqi Jian, Xiao Li, Joanne Chan, Guanlan Dong, Huaying Fang, Aaron E. Robinson, GTEx Consortium, François Aguet, Shankara Anand, Kristin G. Ardlie, Stacey Gabriel, Gad Getz, Aaron Graubert, Kane Hadley, Robert E. Handsaker, Katherine H. Huang, Seva Kashin, Daniel G. MacArthur, Samuel R. Meier, Jared L. Nedzel, Duyen Y. Nguyen, Ayellet V. Segrè, Ellen Todres, Brunilda Balliu, Alvaro N. Barbeira, Alexis Battle, Rodrigo Bonazzola, Andrew Brown, Christopher D. Brown, Stephane E. Castel, Don Conrad, Daniel J. Cotter, Nancy Cox, Sayantan Das, Olivia M. de Goede, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Barbara E. Engelhardt, Eleazar Eskin, Tiffany Y. Eulalio, Nicole M. Ferraro, Elise Flynn, Laure Fresard, Eric R. Gamazon, Diego Garrido-Martín, Nicole R. Gay, Roderic Guigó, Andrew R. Hamel, Yuan He, Paul J. Hoffman, Farhad Hormozdiari, Lei Hou, Hae Kyung Im, Brian Jo, Silva Kasela, Manolis Kellis, Sarah Kim-Hellmuth, Alan Kwong, Tuuli Lappalainen, Xin Li, Yanyu Liang, Serghei Mangul, Pejman Mohammadi, Stephen B. Montgomery, Manuel Muñoz-Aguirre, Daniel C. Nachun, Andrew B. Nobel, Meritxell Oliva, YoSon Park, Yongjin Park, Princy Parsana, Ferran Reverter, John M. Rouhana, Chiara Sabatti, Ashis Saha, Andrew D. Skol, Matthew Stephens, Barbara E. Stranger, Benjamin J. Strober, Nicole A. Teran, Ana Viñuela, Gao Wang, Xiaoquan Wen, Fred Wright, Valentin Wucher, Yuxin Zou, Pedro G. Ferreira, Li, Marta Melé, Esti Yeger-Lotem, Mary E. Barcus, Debra Bradbury, Tanya Krubit, Jeffrey A. McLean, Liqun Qi, Karna Robinson, Nancy V. Roche, Anna M. Smith, Leslie Sobin, David E. Tabor, Anita Undale, Jason Bridge, Lori E. Brigham, Barbara A. Foster, Bryan M. Gillard, Richard Hasz, Marcus Hunter, Christopher Johns, Mark Johnson, Ellen Karasik, Gene Kopen, William F. Leinweber, Alisa McDonald, Michael T. Moser, Kevin Myer, Kimberley D. Ramsey, Brian Roe, Saboor Shad, Jeffrey A. Thomas, Gary Walters, Michael Washington, Joseph Wheeler, Scott D. Jewell, Daniel C. Rohrer, Dana R. Valley, David A. Davis, Deborah C. Mash, Philip A. Branton, Laura K. Barker, Heather M. Gardiner, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura A. Siminoff, Paul Flicek, Maximilian Haeussler, Thomas Juettemann, W. James Kent, Christopher M. Lee, Conner C. Powell, Kate R. Rosenbloom, Magali Ruffier, Dan Sheppard, Kieron Taylor, Stephen J. Trevanion, Daniel R. Zerbino, Nathan S. Abell, Joshua Akey, Lin Chen, Kathryn Demanelis, Jennifer A. Doherty, Andrew P. Feinberg, Kasper D. Hansen, Peter F. Hickey, Farzana Jasmine, Rajinder Kaul, Muhammad G. Kibriya, Jin Billy Li, Qin Li, Sandra E. Linder, Brandon L. Pierce, Lindsay F. Rizzardi, Kevin S. Smith, John Stamatoyannopoulos, Hua Tang, Latarsha J. Carithers, Ping Guan, Susan E. Koester, A. Roger Little, Helen M. Moore, Concepcion R. Nierras, Abhi K. Rao, Jimmie B. Vaught, Simona Volpi, Michael P. Snyder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 670 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 162 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 65 | 10% |
| Germany | 31 | 5% |
| Canada | 22 | 3% |
| Spain | 17 | 3% |
| France | 14 | 2% |
| India | 13 | 2% |
| Australia | 11 | 2% |
| Japan | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 86 | 13% |
| Unknown | 239 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 349 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 299 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 692 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 692 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 171 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 122 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 4% |
| Other | 111 | 16% |
| Unknown | 169 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 230 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 31 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 3% |
| Other | 97 | 14% |
| Unknown | 187 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 424. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#69,224
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#450
of 17,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,320
of 427,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#26
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.