| Title |
A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Nayfach, Simon Roux, Rekha Seshadri, Daniel Udwary, Neha Varghese, Frederik Schulz, Dongying Wu, David Paez-Espino, I-Min Chen, Marcel Huntemann, Krishna Palaniappan, Joshua Ladau, Supratim Mukherjee, T. B. K. Reddy, Torben Nielsen, Edward Kirton, José P. Faria, Janaka N. Edirisinghe, Christopher S. Henry, Sean P. Jungbluth, Dylan Chivian, Paramvir Dehal, Elisha M. Wood-Charlson, Adam P. Arkin, Susannah G. Tringe, Axel Visel, Tanja Woyke, Nigel J. Mouncey, Natalia N. Ivanova, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 987 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 199 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 50 | 5% |
| Spain | 33 | 3% |
| Germany | 33 | 3% |
| Australia | 28 | 3% |
| France | 27 | 3% |
| India | 22 | 2% |
| Canada | 21 | 2% |
| Mexico | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 183 | 19% |
| Unknown | 372 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 541 | 55% |
| Scientists | 430 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 867 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 867 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 181 | 21% |
| Researcher | 165 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 96 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 6% |
| Other | 105 | 12% |
| Unknown | 216 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 203 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 174 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 64 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 50 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 93 | 11% |
| Unknown | 267 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1071. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,826
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#29
of 8,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#596
of 440,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#1
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.