| Title |
“You” speaks to me: Effects of generic-you in creating resonance between people and ideas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2010939117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ariana Orvell, Ethan Kross, Susan A. Gelman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 118 | 78% |
| Scientists | 23 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#172,449
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,350
of 103,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,867
of 528,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#84
of 1,020 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,020 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.