| Title |
Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurogastroenterology & Motility, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nmo.14058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rena Yadlapati, Peter J. Kahrilas, Mark R. Fox, Albert J. Bredenoord, C. Prakash Gyawali, Sabine Roman, Arash Babaei, Ravinder K. Mittal, Nathalie Rommel, Edoardo Savarino, Daniel Sifrim, André Smout, Michael F. Vaezi, Frank Zerbib, Junichi Akiyama, Shobna Bhatia, Serhat Bor, Dustin A. Carlson, Joan W. Chen, Daniel Cisternas, Charles Cock, Enrique Coss‐Adame, Nicola de Bortoli, Claudia Defilippi, Ronnie Fass, Uday C. Ghoshal, Sutep Gonlachanvit, Albis Hani, Geoffrey S. Hebbard, Kee Wook Jung, Philip Katz, David A. Katzka, Abraham Khan, Geoffrey Paul Kohn, Adriana Lazarescu, Johannes Lengliner, Sumeet K. Mittal, Taher Omari, Moo In Park, Roberto Penagini, Daniel Pohl, Joel E. Richter, Jordi Serra, Rami Sweis, Jan Tack, Roger P. Tatum, Radu Tutuian, Marcelo F. Vela, Reuben K. Wong, Justin C. Wu, Yinglian Xiao, John E. Pandolfino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 38% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Pakistan | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 60% |
| Scientists | 21 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 313 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 36 | 12% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 117 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 131 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#588,389
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#33
of 2,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,193
of 519,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#3
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.