| Title |
An Empirical Antigen Selection Method Identifies Neoantigens That Either Elicit Broad Antitumor T-cell Responses or Drive Tumor GrowthATLAS-Identified Neoantigens May Improve Tumor Immunotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0377 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hubert Lam, Lisa K. McNeil, Hanna Starobinets, Victoria L. DeVault, Roger B. Cohen, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Melissa L. Johnson, Maura L. Gillison, Mark N. Stein, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Arthur P. DeCillis, James J. Foti, Vijetha Vemulapalli, Emily Tjon, Kyle Ferber, Daniel B. DeOliveira, Wendy Broom, Parul Agnihotri, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, Kwok-Kin Wong, Charles G. Drake, Pamela M. Carroll, Thomas A. Davis, Jessica Baker Flechtner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 39% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#347,456
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#167
of 4,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,326
of 537,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#13
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.