You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for Adrenalectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3544 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linwah Yip, Quan-Yang Duh, Heather Wachtel, Camilo Jimenez, Cord Sturgeon, Cortney Lee, David Velázquez-Fernández, Eren Berber, Gary D Hammer, Irina Bancos, James A Lee, Jamie Marko, Lilah F Morris-Wiseman, Marybeth S Hughes, Masha J Livhits, Mi-Ah Han, Philip W Smith, Scott Wilhelm, Sylvia L Asa, Thomas J Fahey, Travis J McKenzie, Vivian E Strong, Nancy D Perrier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 38% |
| Mexico | 6 | 6% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Saint Lucia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 33% |
| Scientists | 13 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#514,083
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#510
of 5,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,693
of 440,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#22
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.