You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Understanding How Clinicians Personalize Fluid and Vasopressor Decisions in Early Sepsis Management
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Network Open, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7480 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth S. Munroe, Julien Weinstein, Hayley B. Gershengorn, Kevin J. Karlic, Sarah Seelye, Michael W. Sjoding, Thomas S. Valley, Hallie C. Prescott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 6 | 14% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Kazakhstan | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 31 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 50% |
Other | 2 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,390,556
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#5,438
of 10,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,201
of 229,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#188
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.