↓ Skip to main content

Association of OLE RNA with bacterial membranes via an RNA–protein interaction

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Microbiology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of OLE RNA with bacterial membranes via an RNA–protein interaction
Published in
Molecular Microbiology, November 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07439.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten F. Block, Elena Puerta‐Fernandez, Jason G. Wallace, Ronald R. Breaker

Abstract

Ornate, large, extremophilic (OLE) RNAs are large, non-coding transcripts characterized by their ornate secondary structure and presence predominantly in Gram-positive, extremophilic bacteria. A gene for an OLE-associated protein (OAP) is almost always located immediately downstream of the OLE gene. OAP has no extensive homology to other proteins and is predicted to form multiple transmembrane domains. We show that this protein forms a ribonucleoprotein complex with OLE RNA using at least 2:1 protein : RNA stoichiometry. A series of truncated OLE RNA constructs was used to establish that most of the RNA can be deleted without eliminating protein binding. Two primary binding sites are present within the RNA, although additional binding determinants exist and extensive structural stabilization is induced by OAP. RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used in Escherichia coli to demonstrate that ribonucleoprotein complex formation localizes the RNA near cell membranes of this heterologous system. Therefore, the majority of the complex structure formed by OLE RNA may perform a biochemical function that requires membrane localization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Master 9 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Chemistry 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Microbiology
#6,666
of 6,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,906
of 101,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Microbiology
#31
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.