↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Analysis of Gossypium Fiber Quality Traits in Reciprocal Advanced Backcross Populations

Overview of attention for article published in The Plant Genome, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Analysis of Gossypium Fiber Quality Traits in Reciprocal Advanced Backcross Populations
Published in
The Plant Genome, March 2018
DOI 10.3835/plantgenome2017.06.0057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul Chandnani, Changsoo Kim, Hui Guo, Tariq Shehzad, Jason G. Wallace, Daohua He, Zhengsheng Zhang, Jinesh D. Patel, Jeevan Adhikari, Sameer Khanal, Andrew H. Paterson

Abstract

In mapping populations segregating for many loci, the large amount of variation among genotypes often masks small-effect quantitative trait loci (QTL). This problem can be reduced by development of populations with fewer chromosome segments segregating. Here, we report early QTL detection in reciprocal advanced backcross populations from crosses between elite Gossypium hirsutum L. 'Acala Maxxa' (GH) and G. barbadense L. 'Pima S6' (GB). A total of 297 BCF and BCF progeny rows-127 segregating for GB chromosome segments in GH background and 170 segregating for GH chromosome segments in GB background-were evaluated in three environments. Totals of 3186 and 3026 polymorphic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GH and GB backgrounds, respectively, were identified and used for trait mapping. Small-effect QTL (<10% variance explained) made up 87 and 100% of QTL in GH and GB backgrounds, respectively. In both species, favorable alleles were found with effects being masked or neutralized by unfavorable alleles, with greater scope for improvement of GH than GB by introgressive breeding. A total of three stable QTL-two in GH background for fiber elongation (ELO) and micronaire (MIC) and one in GB background for upper-half mean length (UHM)-were identified in two out of three environments. Curiously, only four QTL-three for UHM and one for ELO-showed the expected opposite effects in reciprocal backgrounds, perhaps reflecting the combined consequences of epistasis, small phenotypic effects, and low coverage of some genomic regions. Along with new information for marker-assisted breeding, this study adds to knowledge that can be used to unravel complex genetic networks governing fiber quality traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Plant Genome
#594
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,495
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Plant Genome
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.