↓ Skip to main content

Directed vaccination against pneumococcal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Directed vaccination against pneumococcal disease
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1603007113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Li, Andrew Hill, Marie Beitelshees, Shuai Shao, Jonathan F Lovell, Bruce A Davidson, Paul R Knight, Anders P Hakansson, Blaine A Pfeifer, Charles H Jones

Abstract

Immunization strategies against commensal bacterial pathogens have long focused on eradicating asymptomatic carriage as well as disease, resulting in changes in the colonizing microflora with unknown future consequences. Additionally, current vaccines are not easily adaptable to sequence diversity and immune evasion. Here, we present a "smart" vaccine that leverages our current understanding of disease transition from bacterial carriage to infection with the pneumococcus serving as a model organism. Using conserved surface proteins highly expressed during virulent transition, the vaccine mounts an immune response specifically against disease-causing bacterial populations without affecting carriage. Aided by a delivery technology capable of multivalent surface display, which can be adapted easily to a changing clinical picture, results include complete protection against the development of pneumonia and sepsis during animal challenge experiments with multiple, highly variable, and clinically relevant pneumococcal isolates. The approach thus offers a unique and dynamic treatment option readily adaptable to other commensal pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Vietnam 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 9 21%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#302,042
of 25,089,705 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,530
of 102,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,957
of 348,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#118
of 877 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,089,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 877 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.