You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alternatively activated macrophages promote pancreatic fibrosis in chronic pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms8158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Xue, Vishal Sharma, Michael H. Hsieh, Ajay Chawla, Ramachandran Murali, Stephen J. Pandol, Aida Habtezion |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Researcher | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,891,058
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#35,959
of 58,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,221
of 282,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#383
of 765 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 765 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.