↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Active Cycling in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, March 2017
Altmetric Badge
5

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Active Cycling in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christel Vanroy, Hilde Feys, Anke Swinnen, Yves Vanlandewijck, Steven Truijen, Dirk Vissers, Marc Michielsen, Kristien Wouters, Patrick Cras

Abstract

To examine the effects of 3-month aerobic training (AT) followed by coaching on aerobic capacity, strength and gait speed after subacute stroke. Randomized controlled trial SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation center PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=59; mean age= 65.4±10.3; 21 women (36%); Barthel Index≤50= 64%) with first stroke and able to cycle at 50 revolutions/minute enrolled in the study 3-10 weeks after stroke onset. Patients were randomly allocated to a 3-month cycling group (ACG, n=33) and education or to a control group (CG, n=26). Afterwards, ACG was randomized into a coaching (n=15) versus non-coaching group (n=16) for nine months. Aerobic capacity, isometric knee extension strength and gait ability and speed were measured before and after intervention and during follow-up at six and 12 months. A non-significant difference was found in workload (Wattpeak) (p=.078) between ACG and CG after three months. Furthermore after 3-month cycling and after nine-month coaching, all groups showed significant changes over time (p≤.027) in peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), Wattpeak, leg strength and gait speed. Also significant changes over time (p<.001) were found in ACG and CG in patients with walking inability at baseline. No significant differences between training groups were found over time. Although our study missed objective exercise data from the training device during follow-up, the 3-month AC program combined with education sessions seemed an applicable method in subacute stroke. New long-term AT interventions should focus on coaching approaches to facilitate training after a supervised AC program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 64 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Sports and Recreations 17 10%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 75 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,877,244
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#2,154
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,183
of 321,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#43
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.