@bingsuzuki ニューイングランド・ジャーナル・オブ・メディシン(NEJM)って日本でも崇めているIF超高い医学誌で、ファイザーワクチンの最初の治験の95%有効って論文はNEJM。 再解析のための生データを出さないので、出せ!とBMJのシニアエディターのPeter Doshiらが同紙で主張しました。https://t.co/szQQkgzlJ5
@MarKes1900 @Food4ears @Ilonawashere Klopt, er werd nog wel gepubliceerd in wetenschappelijke tijdschriften, maar die publicaties kregen nooit tractie in de MSM. Dit stuk van Peter Doshi in de BMJ bijvoorbeeld: https://t.co/1dDOfaf2Jt
Another good article by Peter Doshi on making trial and research data open and available, to ensure trust in the findings. https://t.co/EUJr05KDEk
@factionprosa75 @provoziert Ich weiß, ist Perlen vor die Säue. Ich mach es trotzdem. Brook Jackson https://t.co/hWtRVzli9M https://t.co/RQPDm6kzU7 https://t.co/dRp4UuocF9
@zeldalevine2022 Totally agree, but back in 2021 Dr. Doshi (also Dr. David Healy) were — as far as I know — the only two doctors calling for access to the data. Drs. Doshi and Healy have in fact been calling for the raw data for clinical trials to no avail
@CarmenSousaTacn @Policarpo20201 @242Storm @pensamientcrit https://t.co/FPJyQCoail Los estudios sobre las vacunas fueron insuficientes. Se venía alertando desde 2021 en el BMJ de los conflictos de interés https://t.co/ufm5aD9qZd
RT @PhilipPlickert: Wow: Dieses Editorial des British Medical Journal hat es in sich! Sie fordern die Rohdaten der Tests der Covid-19 Impfs…
@MarKes1900 @pjvanerp @veen_els Dan is zowel goed onderzoek nodig alswel een juiste inschatting van de ziekte. https://t.co/PzEr6dbtIl https://t.co/sKxk6cM7jA https://t.co/wkjHETGiyC
@argueswithyou @BobConn2 @govt_corrupt Actually uou don't need to trust everyone https://t.co/dSSy2pkGvq
@mjtimber2 @kellywind @jolab7 @jsm2334 @gadboit @msabouri @bramkoers_tweet @EphemeralEther And here's an article from Peter Doshi at the BMJ that talks about why this is a problem: https://t.co/wFeuin1BuO
@JaneHogarth84 @elitheiceman__ @SwaledaleMutton @seadogsimi69 @stevethejuice @stkirsch @maryhollandnyc Jane - it's really really obvious you like $$$ > people: https://t.co/ASfEWuwqjC
@JackPearl77 @Real_Landlord7 @DeanPelletier26 @CaulfieldTim @gorskon @doritmi but the trials were never completed were they? Not the phase 3.. those were unblinded and halted. https://t.co/uu5vkc0dtn Do you have sources? additionally, would undisclosed in
@goddeketal Haha, this guy is a scam, almost everything he claims is wrong. https://t.co/vVcUu37IjE
@Rocci8907347735 @galitnaor @OrenNahari שאלות בספרות המדעית. כראוי: https://t.co/K9YIzVvtp8
RT @PhilipPlickert: Wow: Dieses Editorial des British Medical Journal hat es in sich! Sie fordern die Rohdaten der Tests der Covid-19 Impfs…
RT @PhilipPlickert: Wow: Dieses Editorial des British Medical Journal hat es in sich! Sie fordern die Rohdaten der Tests der Covid-19 Impfs…
RT @PhilipPlickert: Wow: Dieses Editorial des British Medical Journal hat es in sich! Sie fordern die Rohdaten der Tests der Covid-19 Impfs…
RT @PhilipPlickert: Wow: Dieses Editorial des British Medical Journal hat es in sich! Sie fordern die Rohdaten der Tests der Covid-19 Impfs…
オリジナルの著者は常に透明性を優先します イタジャイにおけるイベルメクチンに関する元の研究の著者らは、医薬品とワクチンに関する研究の公的データの公開を求めたBMJ – British Medical Journalからの呼びかけに応じ、 https://t.co/sbC4j1M13Y #イベルメクチン
RT @tawphd: Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now | The BMJ https://t.co/61BiD2xaX6
RT @TDBSubstack: @Jikkyleaks The damning part about this discovery is the implication all those papers that claim to 'prove' safety, but th…
Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now | The BMJ https://t.co/61BiD2xaX6
RT @TDBSubstack: @Jikkyleaks The damning part about this discovery is the implication all those papers that claim to 'prove' safety, but th…
RT @TDBSubstack: @Jikkyleaks The damning part about this discovery is the implication all those papers that claim to 'prove' safety, but th…
RT @TDBSubstack: @Jikkyleaks The damning part about this discovery is the implication all those papers that claim to 'prove' safety, but th…
RT @TDBSubstack: @Jikkyleaks The damning part about this discovery is the implication all those papers that claim to 'prove' safety, but th…
RT @TDBSubstack: @Jikkyleaks The damning part about this discovery is the implication all those papers that claim to 'prove' safety, but th…
@compulyze @DiNunno_Antonio @WR4NYGov @databasevisuals Correction, it was BMJ, not the Lancet: https://t.co/FwwPoJX0NY As far as saline placebos, as far as I know gardasil is the only exception: https://t.co/VdaeNPb8gm
@Jikkyleaks The damning part about this discovery is the implication all those papers that claim to 'prove' safety, but then don't offer up any raw data to substantiate the claims. Like when the BMJ demanded to see the raw data for the Pfizer study (wasn'
@HalikRafa Jestem 💉na C19. Szacuje się że 💉przeciw C19 uratowały nawet 19 mln żyć https://t.co/VWOaxdAh53 z drugiej strony trudno zignorować redaktora BMJ: https://t.co/f1NYtIUu33 który domaga się danych. Czy wszyst. zostały upublicznione?🧑🔬
@GeneralMayhem @JulieLovesWind @dhogaza2 @jonathanstea @Jikkyleaks "These people" don't want your cousin's details. Do you want transparency? Transparency is science vs thescienceTM. Fraud is rife. "Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw dat
@dhogaza2 @JulieLovesWind @GeneralMayhem @jonathanstea No. The raw data was not provided. It is only provided in c.50% of RCT's. Are you aware of the FDA FOIA Pfizer Vaccine document release saga? FDA wanted to delay the release of data for 75 years. Doe
@CattledogMeg @amarillis4710 @BrockRiddickIFB Saline is the actual placebo used in all trials because it does nothing. I think literally anything else would be unethical, but "informed consent" wasn't possible because Pfizer was hiding the trial data for
RT @willPS21: @iPolicy @pathgirleepro @Alex_WiseOldOwl @tracybeanz and BTW that's not just my opinion. This 1/2022 BMJ letter makes 3 very…
@iPolicy @pathgirleepro @Alex_WiseOldOwl @tracybeanz and BTW that's not just my opinion. This 1/2022 BMJ letter makes 3 very valid points 1) lack of trial data is unacceptable for informed consent, and morally indefensible 2) pharma's notorious pattern of
@mark_melbin @FatEmperor Big pharma raw trial data is not available for scrutiny (https://t.co/lFKI3XzMJL ), but even still the data released doesn’t show any benefits in terms of transmission or all cause mortality.
@mfwarder Good point on the second paragraph. First, Pfizer / Moderna never released the raw study data on their trials. Unclear if it was even shown to the FDA. That's unacceptable. https://t.co/wFeuin1BuO
@khan_saad_a @IIlIIIIIllIlIlI Don't be silly. Mistrust of pharmaceutical companies, stemming from their criminal past, is not comparable to modernist Muslims attempting to align Islam with the contemporary liberal zeitgeist : Example: https://t.co/VHdaVI
@reluctantlyjoe The trial was unblinded and abandoned! It never completed phase 3 https://t.co/uu5vkc0dtn
「2025年5月まで対応しない意向」 https://t.co/7DjME031uT
RT @VegtDoor: Het Britisch Medical Journal (BMJ) zegt:”Het achterhouden van veiligheidsdata van Covid- vaccins is moreel -en wetenschappeli…
@ilconte_dantes @BobsGarage9 @DrPaoloMezzana "Big pharma è l'industria meno affidabile. Almeno 3 delle aziende produttrici di vaccini covid-19 hanno un passato di processi penali e civili che sono costati loro miliardi di dollari." https://t.co/nbxQo8qqkM
@ABridgen @FraserMyers @Nanaakua1 @GBNEWS This was the case all along, and never hidden, but only the "fringe minority" cared to bring it up. https://t.co/G4f0r9cvwK https://t.co/X883iALd6N https://t.co/KiNWqaePYT https://t.co/H4hTbYoQAM https://t.co/QHw
@M1guelSuna Juuri näin. Korruptoutuneilla luvuilla tuotettua markkinointi pseudo-dataa, joka edustaa tietellisesti haastuneille korkeinta tieto-standardia vain, koska heillä ei ole kykyä arvioida mitä tiede on. https://t.co/2XPIhr9z8D https://t.co/FquTrfHq
@rt7683 @Bogey7767Scott Blanket trust is what’s disturbing people. Also from BMJ.. “Big pharma is the least trusted industry.30 At least three of the many companies making covid-19 vaccines have past criminal and civil settlements costing them billions of
@AurelianoStingi @Jo_fer7 @Johnincarlisle TBMJ: "Le aziende farmaceutiche stanno raccogliendo enormi profitti senza un adeguato controllo indipendente delle loro affermazioni scientifiche". https://t.co/nbxQo8qqkM
@AurelianoStingi @Jo_fer7 @Johnincarlisle TBMJ:"Il BMJ sostiene le politiche di vaccinazione basate su prove solide...non può essere giustificabile che ci si debba semplicemente fidare "del sistema", con la lontana speranza che i dati diventino disponibili
@AurelianoStingi @Jo_fer7 @Johnincarlisle TBMJ: "VACCINI E CURE COVID-19: DOBBIAMO AVERE I DATI GREZZI ORA. Big pharma è l'industria meno affidabile. Almeno 3 delle aziende produttrici di vaccini covid-19 hanno un passato di processi penali e civili costat
@Curve_Planet @nDante @HLiebheart @StopPseudo Un "clasico copy/paste" de la Revista Medica mas famosa y respetable del planeta: BMJ . Yo que tu me preocuparia ante tanta ignorancia de tu parte. https://t.co/NGEHqhCfKM
@BelpietroTweet I dati grezzi. https://t.co/6ea1UaJKmw
@petteruspanus @ChristianDidri4 @goddeketal Syns du pfizer burde offentliggjort rådataene sine fra utprøvingsstudien først som sist, i stedet for å kjempe med nebb og klør for å holde dem for seg selv? https://t.co/81tZDoVgTi
RT @entraraltrapo: Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now | The BMJ https://t.co/xMWxjQk41z
#Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025, 24 months after the primary study completion date, which is listed on https://t.co/3fjacAhFw6 as 15 May 2023 (NCT04368728). https://t.co/0q4aROOGAQ
@JohnGHart @Didtheearthmov1 @ABridgen #Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025, 24 months after the primary study completion date, which is listed on https://t.co/3fjacAhFw6 as 15 May 2023 (NCT0436872
@brunnersoares Big pharma is the least trusted industry. At least three of the many companies making covid-19 vaccines have past criminal and civil settlements costing them billions of dollars. One pleaded guilty to fraud. https://t.co/w2qBGui7iw
RT @sudokuvariante: Also: "Vaccines studies are remarkable for their transparency" 🤣 @GidMK , to need raw data or not to need raw data, tha…
RT @sudokuvariante: Also: "Vaccines studies are remarkable for their transparency" 🤣 @GidMK , to need raw data or not to need raw data, tha…
Also: "Vaccines studies are remarkable for their transparency" 🤣 @GidMK , to need raw data or not to need raw data, that is the question. https://t.co/Y0byqlzn8g https://t.co/EAzFALs0uu https://t.co/dlWYWs3TIb
@cannula_service @maskartists @Jikkyleaks @TheBMA Raw data on shots was never published either. "Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now" https://t.co/lXJJmD5lta All you have are retroactive risk taking analysis.
RT @patochebelleden: Vaccins et traitements contre le Covid-19 : nous devons avoir des données brutes, maintenant | The BMJ https://t.co/65…
RT @Mary100999: REMARQUABLE ANALYSE DU BMJ : Vaccins et traitements contre le Covid-19 : nous devons avoir des données brutes, maintenant…
@patrick_VOR @gslaw1 @thecoastguy Yes, information changes. You won't get Covid if you take these vaccines. 'Safe and effective' becomes 'vaccine harms and deaths' and 'protection wanes very quickly so take repeated boosters'. From no mention of natural
RT @PhilipPlickert: Wow: Dieses Editorial des British Medical Journal hat es in sich! Sie fordern die Rohdaten der Tests der Covid-19 Impfs…
@DavidPNoble63 @JustSayNope The issue is pharma corps won't release the data. srcs: https://t.co/KwqKc67kem /3 ctd
But pharma corps won't release the data to make stronger studies. srcs: https://t.co/KwqKc67kem ctd/
@MarkChangizi Also helps to examine the primary data. Though in the case of the "vaccines" the primary data was not even publicly available. https://t.co/Mzi1wfRzEi
RT @VeritasArdentur: So editorial british medical journal yang baru2 ini menarik sekali. Basically Pfizer nggak bersedia buka data trial v…
"Despite the global rollout of covid-19 vaccines & treatments, the anonymised participant level data underlying the trials for these new products remain inaccessible to doctors, researchers & the public—and are likely to remain that way for years t
Worthwhile to read. https://t.co/2Hc9AigNge
@jason_willz1 @DavidLevan15 @Johnincarlisle @YouTube Good thing these two old men are the only liars and frauds in town. And that we have you to show us all the evidence we need! Yay! https://t.co/AsQWNWqrLU
@billsonofbill @peaches1907 @DrSusanOliver1 Without trial data, their results are meaningless. And yes, the regulatory and institutional capture is an unfathomably grand conspiracy that most can't wrap their heads around. I don't blame you for naivety,