| Title |
Face coverings for covid-19: from medical intervention to social practice.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m3021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helene-Mari van der Westhuizen, Koot Kotze, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Nina Gobat, Trisha Greenhalgh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 313 | 26% |
| United States | 92 | 8% |
| Canada | 25 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 18 | 2% |
| Australia | 17 | 1% |
| South Africa | 12 | 1% |
| Spain | 10 | <1% |
| Ireland | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 107 | 9% |
| Unknown | 571 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 896 | 76% |
| Scientists | 129 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 126 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 30 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 24% |
| Unknown | 75 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#11,406
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#300
of 65,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#554
of 427,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#19
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.