| Title |
Use of “normal” risk to improve understanding of dangers of covid-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m3259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Spiegelhalter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,617 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 379 | 23% |
| United States | 121 | 7% |
| Japan | 82 | 5% |
| France | 26 | 2% |
| Canada | 19 | 1% |
| Australia | 17 | 1% |
| Germany | 16 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 12 | <1% |
| Ireland | 10 | <1% |
| Other | 130 | 8% |
| Unknown | 805 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1294 | 80% |
| Scientists | 193 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 90 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 39 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1370. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#9,455
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#261
of 65,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#467
of 427,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#22
of 762 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 762 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.