↓ Skip to main content

Host Biology in Light of the Microbiome: Ten Principles of Holobionts and Hologenomes

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
874 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1780 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Host Biology in Light of the Microbiome: Ten Principles of Holobionts and Hologenomes
Published in
PLoS Biology, August 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth R. Bordenstein, Kevin R. Theis

Abstract

Groundbreaking research on the universality and diversity of microorganisms is now challenging the life sciences to upgrade fundamental theories that once seemed untouchable. To fully appreciate the change that the field is now undergoing, one has to place the epochs and foundational principles of Darwin, Mendel, and the modern synthesis in light of the current advances that are enabling a new vision for the central importance of microbiology. Animals and plants are no longer heralded as autonomous entities but rather as biomolecular networks composed of the host plus its associated microbes, i.e., "holobionts." As such, their collective genomes forge a "hologenome," and models of animal and plant biology that do not account for these intergenomic associations are incomplete. Here, we integrate these concepts into historical and contemporary visions of biology and summarize a predictive and refutable framework for their evaluation. Specifically, we present ten principles that clarify and append what these concepts are and are not, explain how they both support and extend existing theory in the life sciences, and discuss their potential ramifications for the multifaceted approaches of zoology and botany. We anticipate that the conceptual and evidence-based foundation provided in this essay will serve as a roadmap for hypothesis-driven, experimentally validated research on holobionts and their hologenomes, thereby catalyzing the continued fusion of biology's subdisciplines. At a time when symbiotic microbes are recognized as fundamental to all aspects of animal and plant biology, the holobiont and hologenome concepts afford a holistic view of biological complexity that is consistent with the generally reductionist approaches of biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 224 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,780 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 4 <1%
Mexico 4 <1%
Thailand 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Other 19 1%
Unknown 1716 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 374 21%
Researcher 297 17%
Student > Master 250 14%
Student > Bachelor 212 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 99 6%
Other 256 14%
Unknown 292 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 747 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 247 14%
Environmental Science 118 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 95 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 3%
Other 169 9%
Unknown 355 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 312. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#111,323
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#235
of 9,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,152
of 278,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#4
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.