| Title |
Will Precision Medicine Improve Population Health?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2016.12260 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muin J. Khoury, Sandro Galea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 423 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 150 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 7% |
| Canada | 22 | 5% |
| Spain | 13 | 3% |
| Italy | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% |
| Colombia | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 135 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 257 | 61% |
| Scientists | 94 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 61 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Professor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 54 | 29% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 302. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#116,486
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,857
of 36,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,388
of 328,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#45
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.