↓ Skip to main content

Extending the reach of public health genomics: What should be the agenda for public health in an era of genome-based and “personalized” medicine?

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Extending the reach of public health genomics: What should be the agenda for public health in an era of genome-based and “personalized” medicine?
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, November 2010
DOI 10.1097/gim.0b013e3182011222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wylie Burke, Hilary Burton, Alison E Hall, Mohamed Karmali, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Knoppers, Eric M Meslin, Fiona Stanley, Caroline F Wright, Ronald L Zimmern

Abstract

The decade following the completion of the Human Genome Project has been marked by divergent claims about the utility of genomics for improving population health. On the one hand, genomics is viewed as the harbinger of a brave new world in which novel treatments rectify known causes of disease. On the other hand, genomics may have little practical relevance to the principal causes or remedies of diseases which are predominantly social or environmental in origin, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Those supportive of a role for public health genomics argue that increasing knowledge of genomics and molecular pathology could unlock effective diagnostic techniques and treatments, and better target public health interventions. To resolve some of these tensions, an international multidisciplinary meeting was held in May 2010 in Ickworth, United Kingdom, with the aim of setting an agenda for the development of public health in an era of genome-based and "personalized" medicine. A number of key themes emerged, suggesting a need to reconfigure both the focus for existing genomic research and the stage at which funding is targeted, so that priority is given to areas of greatest potential health impact and that translation from basic science to implementation is given greater emphasis. To support these developments, there should be an immediate, sustained and systematic effort to provide an evidence base. These deliberations formed the basis for six key recommendations, which could guide the practice of public health in an era of genomics and personalized medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 129 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 15%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,333,524
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,494
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,552
of 114,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.