| Title |
Integrating Advanced Molecular Technologies into Public Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1128/jcm.01967-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Gwinn, Duncan R. MacCannell, Rima F. Khabbaz |
| Abstract |
Advances in laboratory and information technologies are transforming public health microbiology. High-throughput genome sequencing and bioinformatics are enhancing our ability to investigate and control outbreaks, detect emerging infectious diseases, develop vaccines, and combat antimicrobial resistance-all with increased accuracy, timeliness, and efficiency. The Advanced Molecular Detection (AMD) initiative has allowed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to provide leadership and coordination in integrating new technologies into routine practice throughout the US public health laboratory system. Collaboration and partnerships are the key to navigating this transition and to leveraging the next generation of methods and tools most effectively for public health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 34% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Morocco | 1 | 2% |
| Algeria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 43% |
| Scientists | 20 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 26% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,042,589
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#282
of 14,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,586
of 422,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#5
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.