↓ Skip to main content

Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
149 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1266 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
Published in
The Lancet, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62227-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P A Ioannidis, Sander Greenland, Mark A Hlatky, Muin J Khoury, Malcolm R Macleod, David Moher, Kenneth F Schulz, Robert Tibshirani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 21 2%
United States 19 2%
Germany 11 <1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Other 20 2%
Unknown 1172 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 255 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 184 15%
Student > Master 156 12%
Other 95 8%
Student > Bachelor 81 6%
Other 310 24%
Unknown 185 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 381 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 9%
Psychology 85 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 6%
Social Sciences 59 5%
Other 291 23%
Unknown 265 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#248,456
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,755
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,213
of 320,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#38
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.