| Title |
Horizon scanning for translational genomic research beyond bench to bedside
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/gim.2013.184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mindy Clyne, Sheri D. Schully, W. David Dotson, Michael P. Douglas, Marta Gwinn, Katherine Kolor, Anja Wulf, M. Scott Bowen, Muin J. Khoury |
| Abstract |
Purpose:The dizzying pace of genomic discoveries is leading to an increasing number of clinical applications. In this report, we provide a method for horizon scanning and 1 year data on translational research beyond bench to bedside to assess the validity, utility, implementation, and outcomes of such applications.Methods:We compiled cross-sectional results of ongoing horizon scanning of translational genomic research, conducted between 16 May 2012 and 15 May 2013, based on a weekly, systematic query of PubMed. A set of 505 beyond bench to bedside articles were collected and classified, including 312 original research articles; 123 systematic and other reviews; 38 clinical guidelines, policies, and recommendations; and 32 articles describing tools, decision support, and educational materials.Results:Most articles (62%) addressed a specific genomic test or other health application; almost half of these (n = 180) were related to cancer. We estimate that these publications account for 0.5% of reported human genomics and genetics research during the same time.Conclusion:These data provide baseline information to track the evolving knowledge base and gaps in genomic medicine. Continuous horizon scanning of the translational genomics literature is crucial for an evidence-based translation of genomics discoveries into improved health care and disease prevention.Genet Med advance online publication 9 January 2014Genetics in Medicine (2014); doi:10.1038/gim.2013.184. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 68% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 32% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,425,776
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#468
of 2,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,532
of 318,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.