↓ Skip to main content

SEER Cancer Registry Biospecimen Research: Yesterday and Tomorrow

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
SEER Cancer Registry Biospecimen Research: Yesterday and Tomorrow
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, December 2014
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0490
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean F Altekruse, Gabriel E Rosenfeld, Danielle M Carrick, Emilee J Pressman, Sheri D Schully, Leah E Mechanic, Kathleen A Cronin, Brenda Y Hernandez, Charles F Lynch, Wendy Cozen, Muin J Khoury, Lynne T Penberthy

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries have been a source of biospecimens for cancer research for decades. Recently, registry-based biospecimen studies have become more practical, with the expansion of electronic networks for pathology and medical record reporting. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens are now used for next-generation sequencing and other molecular techniques. These developments create new opportunities for SEER biospecimen research. We evaluated 31 research articles published during 2005 to 2013 based on authors' confirmation that these studies involved linkage of SEER data to biospecimens. Rather than providing an exhaustive review of all possible articles, our intent was to indicate the breadth of research made possible by such a resource. We also summarize responses to a 2012 questionnaire that was broadly distributed to the NCI intra- and extramural biospecimen research community. This included responses from 30 investigators who had used SEER biospecimens in their research. The survey was not intended to be a systematic sample, but instead to provide anecdotal insight on strengths, limitations, and the future of SEER biospecimen research. Identified strengths of this research resource include biospecimen availability, cost, and annotation of data, including demographic information, stage, and survival. Shortcomings include limited annotation of clinical attributes such as detailed chemotherapy history and recurrence, and timeliness of turnaround following biospecimen requests. A review of selected SEER biospecimen articles, investigator feedback, and technological advances reinforced our view that SEER biospecimen resources should be developed. This would advance cancer biology, etiology, and personalized therapy research. See all the articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Biomarkers, Biospecimens, and New Technologies in Molecular Epidemiology." Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(12); 2681-7. ©2014 AACR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#3,056
of 4,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,409
of 368,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#60
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.