| Title |
A Public Health Perspective on a National Precision Medicine Cohort: Balancing Long-term Knowledge Generation With Early Health Benefit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2015.3382 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muin J. Khoury, James P. Evans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 67 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 7 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 67 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 108 | 58% |
| Scientists | 40 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 27% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#368,534
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,366
of 36,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,899
of 282,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#63
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.