↓ Skip to main content

Precision Medicine In Action: The Impact Of Ivacaftor On Cystic Fibrosis–Related Hospitalizations

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Precision Medicine In Action: The Impact Of Ivacaftor On Cystic Fibrosis–Related Hospitalizations
Published in
Health Affairs, May 2018
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1554
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa B Feng, Scott D Grosse, Ridgely Fisk Green, Aliza K Fink, Gregory S Sawicki

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis is a life-threatening genetic disease that causes severe damage to the lungs. Ivacaftor, the first drug that targeted the underlying defect of the disease caused by specific mutations, is a sterling example of the potential of precision medicine. Clinical trial and registry studies showed that ivacaftor improved outcomes and reduced hospitalizations. Our study used US administrative claims data to assess the real-world effectiveness of ivacaftor. Comparing twelve-month rates before and after starting the use of ivacaftor among people who initiated therapy during 2012-2015, we found that overall and cystic fibrosis-related inpatient admissions fell by 55 percent and 81 percent, respectively. There was a comparable reduction in inpatient spending. Ivacaftor appears to be effective for multiple mutations that cause the disease, as suggested by the fact that during the study period, ivacaftor's use was extended to nine additional mutations in 2014. Examination of evidence from clinical trial, clinical care, and administrative data sources is important for understanding the real-world effectiveness of precision medicines such as ivacaftor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 26 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#901,685
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#1,814
of 6,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,663
of 339,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#42
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.