| Title |
A Proposed Approach for Implementing Genomics-Based Screening Programs for Healthy Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NAM Perspectives, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.31478/201812a |
| Authors |
Michael F. Murray, James P. Evans, Misha Angrist, Wendy R. Uhlmann, Debra Lochner Doyle, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Theodore G. Ganiats, Jill Hagenkord, Sara Imhof, Sun Hee Rim, Leonard Ortmann, Nazneen Aziz, W. David Dotson, Ellen Matloff, Kristen Young, Kimberly Kaphingst, Angela Bradbury, Joan Scott, Catharine Wang, Ann Zauber, Marissa Levine, Bruce Korf, Debra G. Leonard, Catherine Wicklund, George Isham, Muin J. Khoury |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 63% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Oman | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 65% |
| Scientists | 12 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#619,761
of 24,904,819 outputs
Outputs from NAM Perspectives
#33
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,102
of 447,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NAM Perspectives
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,904,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.