↓ Skip to main content

Gardening for Health: Using Garden Coordinators and Volunteers to Implement Rural School and Community Gardens

Overview of attention for article published in Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Gardening for Health: Using Garden Coordinators and Volunteers to Implement Rural School and Community Gardens
Published in
Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy, January 2019
DOI 10.5888/pcd12.190117
Authors

Suzanne Stluka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,858,223
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy
#446
of 1,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,827
of 440,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.