Title |
Reduced Incidence of Chikungunya Virus Infection in Communities with Ongoing Aedes Aegypti Mosquito Trap Intervention Studies - Salinas and Guayama, Puerto Rico, November 2015-February 2016.
|
---|---|
Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6518e3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olga D Lorenzi, Chelsea Major, Veronica Acevedo, Janice Perez-Padilla, Aidsa Rivera, Brad J Biggerstaff, Jorge Munoz-Jordan, Stephen Waterman, Roberto Barrera, Tyler M Sharp |
Abstract |
Aedes species mosquitoes transmit chikungunya virus, as well as dengue and Zika viruses, and bite most often during the day.* Infectious mosquito bites frequently occur in and around homes (1,2). Caribbean countries first reported local transmission of chikungunya virus in December 2013, and soon after, chikungunya virus spread throughout the Americas (3). Puerto Rico reported its first laboratory-positive chikungunya case in May 2014 (4), and subsequently identified approximately 29,000 suspected cases throughout the island by the end of 2015.(†) Because conventional vector control approaches often fail to result in effective and sustainable prevention of infection with viruses transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes (5), and to improve surveillance of mosquito population densities, CDC developed an Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) (6) to attract and capture the female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes responsible for transmission of infectious agents to humans (Figure). The AGO trap is a simple, low-cost device that requires no use of pesticides and no servicing for an extended period of time (6). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 23 | 42% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 7% |
Georgia | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 20% |
Scientists | 6 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 17% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Other | 27 | 26% |
Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |