↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers in Cancer Epidemiology: A Challenge to the Research Community from the Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program at the National Cancer Institute

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Frontiers in Cancer Epidemiology: A Challenge to the Research Community from the Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program at the National Cancer Institute
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2012
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-0525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muin J Khoury, Andrew N Freedman, Elizabeth M Gillanders, Chinonye E Harvey, Christie Kaefer, Britt C Reid, Scott Rogers, Sheri D Schully, Daniela Seminara, Mukesh Verma

Abstract

The Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program (EGRP) at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is developing scientific priorities for cancer epidemiology research in the next decade. We would like to engage the research community and other stakeholders in a planning effort that will include a workshop in December 2012 to help shape new foci for cancer epidemiology research. To facilitate the process of defining the future of cancer epidemiology, we invite the research community to join in an ongoing web-based conversation at http://blog-epi.grants.cancer.gov/ to develop priorities and the next generation of high-impact studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#3,849
of 4,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,933
of 177,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.