↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Direct Brain Stimulation Modulates Encoding States and Memory Performance in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
91 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
67 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
Title
Direct Brain Stimulation Modulates Encoding States and Memory Performance in Humans
Published in
Current Biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youssef Ezzyat, James E. Kragel, John F. Burke, Deborah F. Levy, Anastasia Lyalenko, Paul Wanda, Logan O’Sullivan, Katherine B. Hurley, Stanislav Busygin, Isaac Pedisich, Michael R. Sperling, Gregory A. Worrell, Michal T. Kucewicz, Kathryn A. Davis, Timothy H. Lucas, Cory S. Inman, Bradley C. Lega, Barbara C. Jobst, Sameer A. Sheth, Kareem Zaghloul, Michael J. Jutras, Joel M. Stein, Sandhitsu R. Das, Richard Gorniak, Daniel S. Rizzuto, Michael J. Kahana

Abstract

People often forget information because they fail to effectively encode it. Here, we test the hypothesis that targeted electrical stimulation can modulate neural encoding states and subsequent memory outcomes. Using recordings from neurosurgical epilepsy patients with intracranially implanted electrodes, we trained multivariate classifiers to discriminate spectral activity during learning that predicted remembering from forgetting, then decoded neural activity in later sessions in which we applied stimulation during learning. Stimulation increased encoding-state estimates and recall if delivered when the classifier indicated low encoding efficiency but had the reverse effect if stimulation was delivered when the classifier indicated high encoding efficiency. Higher encoding-state estimates from stimulation were associated with greater evidence of neural activity linked to contextual memory encoding. In identifying the conditions under which stimulation modulates memory, the data suggest strategies for therapeutically treating memory dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 411 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 88 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 20%
Student > Master 43 10%
Student > Bachelor 34 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 5%
Other 82 20%
Unknown 68 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 114 27%
Psychology 63 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 8%
Engineering 35 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 5%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 109 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 798. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#23,586
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#231
of 14,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#430
of 324,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#7
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.