↓ Skip to main content

Cell Press

Dopamine Enhances Expectation of Pleasure in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dopamine Enhances Expectation of Pleasure in Humans
Published in
Current Biology, November 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tali Sharot, Tamara Shiner, Annemarie C. Brown, Judy Fan, Raymond J. Dolan

Abstract

Human action is strongly influenced by expectations of pleasure. Making decisions, ranging from which products to buy to which job offer to accept, requires an estimation of how good (or bad) the likely outcomes will make us feel [1]. Yet, little is known about the biological basis of subjective estimations of future hedonic reactions. Here, we show that administration of a drug that enhances dopaminergic function (dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine; L-DOPA) during the imaginative construction of positive future life events subsequently enhances estimates of the hedonic pleasure to be derived from these same events. These findings provide the first direct evidence for the role of dopamine in the modulation of subjective hedonic expectations in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 3 1%
Italy 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 207 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 19%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Other 48 21%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 15%
Neuroscience 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 10%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 38 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#497,000
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#1,875
of 14,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,120
of 107,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#5
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.