| Title |
Li-CO2 Electrochemistry: A New Strategy for CO2 Fixation and Energy Storage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Joule, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.001 |
| Authors |
Yu Qiao, Jin Yi, Shichao Wu, Yang Liu, Sixie Yang, Ping He, Haoshen Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 23% |
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 35 | 18% |
| Engineering | 20 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 19 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 18 | 9% |
| Energy | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 76 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#637,223
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Joule
#254
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,500
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Joule
#12
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.