| Title |
The conceptual penis as a social construct
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cogent Social Sciences, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1080/23311886.2017.1330439 |
| Authors |
Jamie Lindsay, Peter Boyle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 11% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 77 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 90% |
| Scientists | 5 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Engineering | 16 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 40% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#235,864
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Cogent Social Sciences
#2
of 501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,836
of 327,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cogent Social Sciences
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.