Title |
Prevalence of Symptoms in Patients Discharged from COVID Care Facility of NIMS Hospital: Is RT PCR Negativity Truly Reflecting Recovery? A Single-Centre Observational Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s295499 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Balvir S Tomar, Mahaveer Singh, Deepak Nathiya, Abhishek Sharma, Eshan Sharma, Hemant Bareth, Supriya Suman, Darshan Purshotambhai Ruparelia, Jaykumar Bharatbhai Patel, Vikrant Kantilal Gajera, On Behalf of the NIMS COVID 19 Investigator Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Librarian | 4 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 37 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,846,168
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#327
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,665
of 453,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#11
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.