↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Nursing versus Usual Therapist-Led Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Nursing versus Usual Therapist-Led Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2021
DOI 10.2147/cia.s306255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianmiao Wang, Yuping Zhang, Yuanyuan Chen, Mei Li, Hongyan Yang, Jinhua Chen, Qiaomin Tang, Jingfen Jin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Master 7 8%
Unspecified 3 3%
Lecturer 3 3%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 54 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 52 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,407
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,021
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#21
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.