You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Plastic ingestion as an evolutionary trap: Toward a holistic understanding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.abh0945 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robson G Santos, Gabriel E Machovsky-Capuska, Ryan Andrades |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 914 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 73 | 8% |
Chile | 42 | 5% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 35 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 29 | 3% |
Mexico | 23 | 3% |
Spain | 22 | 2% |
India | 22 | 2% |
Brazil | 18 | 2% |
Canada | 14 | 2% |
Other | 193 | 21% |
Unknown | 443 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 746 | 82% |
Scientists | 132 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 45 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
Other | 46 | 15% |
Unknown | 100 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 52 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Unspecified | 7 | 2% |
Other | 44 | 15% |
Unknown | 117 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 756. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#26,731
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,196
of 83,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,048
of 456,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#37
of 834 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 834 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.