↓ Skip to main content

A global-scale expert assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 2,196)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
97 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
522 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A global-scale expert assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01534-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn V. Dicks, Tom D. Breeze, Hien T. Ngo, Deepa Senapathi, Jiandong An, Marcelo A. Aizen, Parthiba Basu, Damayanti Buchori, Leonardo Galetto, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Barbara Gemmill-Herren, Brad G. Howlett, Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca, Steven D. Johnson, Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki, Yong Jung Kwon, H. Michael G. Lattorff, Thingreipi Lungharwo, Colleen L. Seymour, Adam J. Vanbergen, Simon G. Potts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 522 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 430 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 19%
Researcher 55 13%
Student > Master 50 12%
Student > Bachelor 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 134 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 35%
Environmental Science 59 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 1%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 159 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,846
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#46
of 2,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#534
of 424,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#3
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.