You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How deregulation, drought and increasing fire impact Amazonian biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03876-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao Feng, Cory Merow, Zhihua Liu, Daniel S. Park, Patrick R. Roehrdanz, Brian Maitner, Erica A. Newman, Brad L. Boyle, Aaron Lien, Joseph R. Burger, Mathias M. Pires, Paulo M. Brando, Mark B. Bush, Crystal N. H. McMichael, Danilo M. Neves, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Scott R. Saleska, Lee Hannah, David D. Breshears, Tom P. Evans, José R. Soto, Kacey C. Ernst, Brian J. Enquist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 525 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 66 | 13% |
| Brazil | 45 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 6% |
| Argentina | 17 | 3% |
| Spain | 12 | 2% |
| France | 11 | 2% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 78 | 15% |
| Unknown | 239 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 389 | 74% |
| Scientists | 121 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 18% |
| Unknown | 94 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 118 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 664. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#33,163
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,994
of 99,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,185
of 436,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#94
of 924 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 924 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.