↓ Skip to main content

Species richness is more important for ecosystem functioning than species turnover along an elevational gradient

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
53 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species richness is more important for ecosystem functioning than species turnover along an elevational gradient
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, September 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01550-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg Albrecht, Marcell K. Peters, Joscha N. Becker, Christina Behler, Alice Classen, Andreas Ensslin, Stefan W. Ferger, Friederike Gebert, Friederike Gerschlauer, Maria Helbig-Bonitz, William J. Kindeketa, Anna Kühnel, Antonia V. Mayr, Henry K. Njovu, Holger Pabst, Ulf Pommer, Juliane Röder, Gemma Rutten, David Schellenberger Costa, Natalia Sierra-Cornejo, Anna Vogeler, Maximilian G. R. Vollstädt, Hamadi I. Dulle, Connal D. Eardley, Kim M. Howell, Alexander Keller, Ralph S. Peters, Victor Kakengi, Claudia Hemp, Jie Zhang, Peter Manning, Thomas Mueller, Christina Bogner, Katrin Böhning-Gaese, Roland Brandl, Dietrich Hertel, Bernd Huwe, Ralf Kiese, Michael Kleyer, Christoph Leuschner, Yakov Kuzyakov, Thomas Nauss, Marco Tschapka, Markus Fischer, Andreas Hemp, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Matthias Schleuning

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 47 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 50 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#591,481
of 24,903,209 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#959
of 2,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,126
of 426,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#22
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,903,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 150.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.