You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence for massive and recurrent toxic blooms of Alexandrium catenella in the Alaskan Arctic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2107387118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald M. Anderson, Evangeline Fachon, Robert S. Pickart, Peigen Lin, Alexis D. Fischer, Mindy L. Richlen, Victoria Uva, Michael L. Brosnahan, Leah McRaven, Frank Bahr, Kathi Lefebvre, Jacqueline M. Grebmeier, Seth L. Danielson, Yihua Lyu, Yuri Fukai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| Uganda | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#425,496
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,549
of 103,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,553
of 439,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#163
of 966 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 966 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.