You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of ultrasonography performed by examiners with varied training and experience in predicting specific pathology of adnexal masses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/uog.14675 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Sayasneh, J. Kaijser, J. Preisler, A. A. Smith, F. Raslan, S. Johnson, R. Husicka, L. Ferrara, C. Stalder, S. Ghaem‐Maghami, D. Timmerman, T. Bourne |
| Abstract |
To assess diagnostic performance of subjective assessment (SA) by level II ultrasound examiners for predicting the specific histology of adnexal masses METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Women older than 16 years with at least one adnexal mass were included and underwent transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) by level II examiners who were familiar with the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group definitions of ultrasound features of ovarian masses.. Final outcome was histology.. Specific diagnoses were divided into 17 groups. Agreement between SA and histology was measured using un-weighted kappa coefficients. Sensitivities and specificities for SA were obtained. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 51% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#1,148
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,982
of 279,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.