↓ Skip to main content

Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, May 2013
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2013.224
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Sayasneh, L Wynants, J Preisler, J Kaijser, S Johnson, C Stalder, R Husicka, Y Abdallah, F Raslan, A Drought, A A Smith, S Ghaem-Maghami, E Epstein, B Van Calster, D Timmerman, T Bourne

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,276,072
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#2,181
of 10,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,833
of 194,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#24
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.