You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do pocket‐sized ultrasound machines have the potential to be used as a tool to triage patients in obstetrics and gynecology?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/uog.11184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Sayasneh, J. Preisler, A. Smith, S. Saso, O. Naji, Y. Abdallah, C. Stalder, A. Daemen, D. Timmerman, T. Bourne |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the performance and potential impact on patient management of a pocket-sized ultrasound machine (PUM) in comparison to high-specification ultrasound machines (HSUM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,353,874
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#532
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,378
of 179,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.