| Title |
Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Nutrition, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007114516001653 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Bucher, Clare Collins, Megan E. Rollo, Tracy A. McCaffrey, Nienke De Vlieger, Daphne Van der Bend, Helen Truby, Federico J. A. Perez-Cueto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 41% |
| Scientists | 17 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 967 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 966 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 201 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 128 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 11% |
| Researcher | 97 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 66 | 7% |
| Other | 146 | 15% |
| Unknown | 220 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 106 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 81 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 71 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 67 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 7% |
| Other | 308 | 32% |
| Unknown | 270 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#148,075
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#82
of 6,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,715
of 316,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.