↓ Skip to main content

University of Newcastle, Australia

High-Intensity Interval Training for Cognitive and Mental Health in Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
44 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
544 Mendeley
Title
High-Intensity Interval Training for Cognitive and Mental Health in Adolescents
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, October 2016
DOI 10.1249/mss.0000000000000993
Pubmed ID
Authors

SARAH A. COSTIGAN, NARELLE EATHER, RONALD C. PLOTNIKOFF, CHARLES H. HILLMAN, DAVID R. LUBANS

Abstract

Emerging literature suggests that physical activity and fitness may have a positive impact on cognitive and mental health for adolescents. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of two high intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols for improving cognitive and mental health outcomes (executive function, psychological wellbeing, psychological distress and physical self-concept) in adolescents. Participants (n=65; mean age=15.8±0.6) were randomized to three conditions: aerobic exercise program (AEP; n=21), resistance and aerobic exercise program (RAP; n=22) and control (n=22). HIIT sessions (8-10min/session) were delivered during physical education lessons or at lunchtime three times/week for 8-weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline and immediate post-intervention to detect changes in executive function (Trail Making Test, TMT), psychological wellbeing, psychological distress and physical self-description, by researchers blinded to treatment allocation. Intervention effects were examined using linear mixed models. Cohen's d effect sizes and clinical inference were also calculated. Small improvements in executive function (d=-0.32, 95%CI -9.12 to 9.77; p=0.386) and psychological wellbeing (d=0.34, 95%CI -1.73 to 2.37; p=0.252) were evident in the AEP group. Moderate improvements in executive function (d=-0.51, 95% CI -8.92 to 9.73; p=0.171), and small improvements in wellbeing (d=0.35, 95%CI -1.46 to 2.53; p=0.219) and perceived appearance (d=0.35, 95%CI -0.74 to 0.41; p=0.249), were observed for the RAP group. Mean feelings state scores improved from pre-workout to post-post workout in both HIIT conditions, with significant results for the AEP (p=0.001). This study highlights the potential of embedding HIIT within the school day for improving cognitive and mental health among adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 544 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 540 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 14%
Student > Bachelor 68 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 10%
Researcher 47 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 73 13%
Unknown 189 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 132 24%
Psychology 54 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 7%
Social Sciences 35 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 5%
Other 45 8%
Unknown 213 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#265,963
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#220
of 7,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,189
of 332,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#7
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.