You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pedro Hallal: putting physical activity at the heart of better health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31148-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Lane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Canada | 6 | 10% |
| Australia | 6 | 10% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Finland | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 54% |
| Scientists | 16 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 20% |
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 30% |
| Sports and Recreations | 22 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#860,985
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#6,941
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,856
of 380,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#113
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.