↓ Skip to main content

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, April 2004
Altmetric Badge
65

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
871 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data
Published in
The Lancet, April 2004
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16043-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig J Whittington, Tim Kendall, Peter Fonagy, David Cottrell, Andrew Cotgrove, Ellen Boddington

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
Spain 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 428 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 70 15%
Researcher 69 15%
Student > Master 65 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 107 23%
Unknown 66 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 27%
Psychology 102 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 4%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Other 91 20%
Unknown 83 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#674,007
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,806
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#660
of 67,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#11
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.