You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60834-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin J O'Donnell, Denis Xavier, Lisheng Liu, Hongye Zhang, Siu Lim Chin, Purnima Rao-Melacini, Sumathy Rangarajan, Shofiqul Islam, Prem Pais, Matthew J McQueen, Charles Mondo, Albertino Damasceno, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Graeme J Hankey, Antonio L Dans, Khalid Yusoff, Thomas Truelsen, Hans-Christoph Diener, Ralph L Sacco, Danuta Ryglewicz, Anna Czlonkowska, Christian Weimar, Xingyu Wang, Salim Yusuf, on behalf of the INTERSTROKE investigators |
| Abstract |
The contribution of various risk factors to the burden of stroke worldwide is unknown, particularly in countries of low and middle income. We aimed to establish the association of known and emerging risk factors with stroke and its primary subtypes, assess the contribution of these risk factors to the burden of stroke, and explore the differences between risk factors for stroke and myocardial infarction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 6 | 25% |
| South Africa | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,761 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2699 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 372 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 366 | 13% |
| Researcher | 271 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 264 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 216 | 8% |
| Other | 546 | 20% |
| Unknown | 726 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1089 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 190 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 138 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 3% |
| Other | 349 | 13% |
| Unknown | 812 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#155,611
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,938
of 43,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349
of 106,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.