You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61268-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon JS Rustin, Maria EL van der Burg, Clare L Griffin, David Guthrie, Alan Lamont, Gordon C Jayson, Gunnar Kristensen, César Mediola, Corneel Coens, Wendi Qian, Mahesh KB Parmar, Ann Marie Swart, for the MRC OV05, EORTC 55955 investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 26% |
| Japan | 8 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 79% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 363 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 18% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 88 | 24% |
| Unknown | 75 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 216 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 1% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Unknown | 96 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#468,135
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,442
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,225
of 113,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#14
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.